<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="uk">
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Good_To_Great_Online_Free</id>
		<title>Good To Great Online Free - Історія редагувань</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Good_To_Great_Online_Free"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Good_To_Great_Online_Free&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-30T14:49:21Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Історія редагувань цієї сторінки в вікі</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Good_To_Great_Online_Free&amp;diff=205987&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Doordrop86: Створена сторінка: Primarily based on difficult evidence and volumes of  data, the e-book author (Jim Collins) and his staff uncover  timeless rules on how the great-to-great orga...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Good_To_Great_Online_Free&amp;diff=205987&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-07-20T16:53:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Створена сторінка: Primarily based on difficult evidence and volumes of  data, the e-book author (Jim Collins) and his staff uncover  timeless rules on how the great-to-great orga...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Нова сторінка&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Primarily based on difficult evidence and volumes of &lt;br /&gt;
data, the e-book author (Jim Collins) and his staff uncover &lt;br /&gt;
timeless rules on how the great-to-great organizations like &lt;br /&gt;
Abbott, Circuit Metropolis, Fannie Mae, Gillette, Kimberly-Clark, &lt;br /&gt;
Kroger, Nucor, Philip Morris, Pitney Bowes, Walgreens, and &lt;br /&gt;
Wells Fargo created sustained excellent final results and [https://www.amazon.com/Good-Great-Collins-Summary-Analysis/dp/1535024372 good to great summary] accomplished &lt;br /&gt;
enduring greatness, evolving into businesses that were in fact &lt;br /&gt;
'Built to Last'.The Collins group picked 2 sets of comparison businesses:a. Direct comparisons - Businesses in the same industry with the identical sources and possibilities as the great-to-excellent team but confirmed no leap in overall performance, which ended up: Upjohn, Silo, Wonderful Western, Warner-Lambert, Scott Paper, A&amp;amp;ampP, Bethlehem Metal, RJ Reynolds, Addressograph, Eckerd,    and Bank of America.b. Unsustained comparisons - Businesses that manufactured a limited-term shift from good to wonderful but failed to preserve the trajectory, specifically: Burroughs, Chrysler, Harris, Hasbro, Rubbermaid, and TeledyneWisdom In A Nutshell:a. Ten out of eleven good-to-wonderful business leaders or CEOs arrived from the inside of. They have been not outsiders employed in to  'save' the business. They had been both people who worked    numerous a long time at the organization or have been customers of the family    that owned the business.b. Strategy for every se did not individual the excellent to wonderful    organizations from the comparison teams.c. Very good-to-great businesses target on what Not to do and what   they ought to stop carrying out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
d. Technology has nothing to do with the transformation from    excellent to fantastic. It could assist accelerate it but is not the    lead to of it.e. Mergers and acquisitions do not trigger a transformation    from excellent to excellent.f. Very good-to-wonderful businesses compensated little attention to taking care of    change or motivating folks. Underneath the right problems,    these problems by natural means go absent.g. Good-to-great transformations did not need to have any new name,    tagline, or launch plan. The leap was in the    performance benefits, not a innovative approach.h. Greatness is not a purpose of circumstance it is clearly    a make a difference of mindful decision.i. Each excellent-to-excellent firm experienced &amp;quot;Level five&amp;quot; leadership in the course of    pivotal transition years, the place Amount 1 is a Hugely Able    Individual, Level two is a Contributing Team Member, Stage three    is the Competent Manager, Degree 4 is an Efficient Chief,    and Degree five is the Executive who builds enduring greatness    by way of a paradoxical blend of personalized humility and    professional will.j. Amount 5 leaders display a compelling modesty, are    self-effacing and understated. In contrast, two thirds of    the comparison businesses experienced leaders with gargantuan    personalized egos that contributed to the demise or continued    mediocrity of the business.k. Degree 5 leaders are fanatically pushed, contaminated with an    incurable require to create sustained results. They are    resolved to do no matter what it will take to make the organization great,    no matter how big or hard the decisions.l. One particular of the most harming trends in current heritage is the    inclination (especially of boards of directors) to select    stunning, celeb leaders and to de-decide on prospective Stage    5 leaders.m. Likely Degree 5 leaders exist all all around us, we just have    to know what to look for.n.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Doordrop86</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>