<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="uk">
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Nutlin-3_Really_A_Hidden_research</id>
		<title>Nutlin-3 Really A Hidden research - Історія редагувань</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Nutlin-3_Really_A_Hidden_research"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Nutlin-3_Really_A_Hidden_research&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-05T18:48:33Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Історія редагувань цієї сторінки в вікі</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Nutlin-3_Really_A_Hidden_research&amp;diff=177292&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Burst58alto: Створена сторінка: When the T stages were analyzed separately, EUS showed an accuracy of 76% for T1, 72% for T2, 91% for T3 and 67% for T4 stages. Overall, EUS misstaged T in 16%...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Nutlin-3_Really_A_Hidden_research&amp;diff=177292&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-05-16T16:39:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Створена сторінка: When the T stages were analyzed separately, EUS showed an accuracy of 76% for T1, 72% for T2, 91% for T3 and 67% for T4 stages. Overall, EUS misstaged T in 16%...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Нова сторінка&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;When the T stages were analyzed separately, EUS showed an accuracy of 76% for T1, 72% for T2, 91% for T3 and 67% for T4 stages. Overall, EUS misstaged T in 16% of cases, with 11% of overstaging and 5% of understaging [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thymidine_kinase Thymidine kinase] errors. The presence of a stricture lowered the accuracy rate of EUS for T stage from 93% to 56%; similarly the distance of RC from the anal verge affected the accuracy of EUS for T stage, which decreased from 92% for tumors located &amp;gt; 5 cm from the anal verge to 67% for cancer sites [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-737.html ABT-737 clinical trial] data suggest that EUS should be used together with MRI for predicting CRM involvement in low anterior RC. N STAGING EUS allows the assessment of perirectal lymph nodes for metastatic infiltration: these are metastatic when they appear as roundish or oval, homogeneous echo-poor nodules with a short axis of at least 5 mm (Figure ?(Figure66)[5,7,9,10]. According to the number of metastatic lymph nodes, there are two different N (uN) echoendoscopic stages (Table ?(Table66). Figure 6 Perirectal metastatic lymph node: Ultrasonographic view. Endoscopic ultrasound with radial array transducer UM160 (5-20 [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Nutlin-3.html Selleck Nutlin-3] MHz). White arrow: Perirectal metastatic lymph node. Table 6 N staging at endoscopic ultrasound, according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes The incidence of malignant metastatic lymph nodes in patients with RC is strictly related to T stage and varies from 6%-11% for T1, 10%-35% for T2 and 26%-65% for T4 RC[3,5,7,8]. Determination of lymph nodes involvement during EUS is difficult and less precise, with a variable accuracy of 63%-85% (Table ?(Table44)[12-45]. Kauer et al[34] reported that EUS has an overall accuracy of 68% in diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes associated to RC, with a sensitivity of 52% and a specificity of 82%. A recent meta-analysis of 35 published studies evaluated the accuracy of EUS in diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes of patients with RC[7].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Burst58alto</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>